Radeon 760M vs GMA X4700MHD

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated405
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data67.04
ArchitectureGeneration 5.0 (2008)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)
GPU code nameMontevinaPhoenix
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 October 2008 (16 years ago)31 January 2024 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores80512
Core clock speed640 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2599 MHz
Number of transistorsno data25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)13 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate6.40083.17
Floating-point processing power0.1024 TFLOPS5.323 TFLOPS
ROPs116
TMUs1032
Ray Tracing Coresno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsMotherboard Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.8
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2008 31 January 2024
Chip lithography 65 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 13 Watt 15 Watt

GMA X4700MHD has 15.4% lower power consumption.

Radeon 760M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 15 years, and a 1525% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GMA X4700MHD and Radeon 760M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GMA X4700MHD is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 760M is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel GMA X4700MHD
GMA X4700MHD
AMD Radeon 760M
Radeon 760M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 4 votes

Rate GMA X4700MHD on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 370 votes

Rate Radeon 760M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GMA X4700MHD or Radeon 760M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.