Radeon RX 6900 vs GMA X4500M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated36
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data19.26
ArchitectureGeneration 5.0 (2008)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameEaglelakeNavi 21
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 October 2008 (17 years ago)28 October 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores804608
Core clock speed400 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data2105 MHz
Number of transistorsno data23,000 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)13 Watt255 Watt
Texture fill rate4.000606.2
Floating-point processing power0.064 TFLOPS19.4 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs10288

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared16 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared16 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data512.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.5
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2008 28 October 2020
Chip lithography 65 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 13 Watt 255 Watt

GMA X4500M has 1861.5% lower power consumption.

RX 6900, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GMA X4500M and Radeon RX 6900. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GMA X4500M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 6900 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel GMA X4500M
GMA X4500M
AMD Radeon RX 6900
Radeon RX 6900

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 11 votes

Rate GMA X4500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 89 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GMA X4500M or Radeon RX 6900, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.