Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile vs GMA X4500M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGeneration 5.0 (2008)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameEaglelakeTU106
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date1 October 2008 (17 years ago)27 May 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores801920 ×2
Core clock speed400 MHz945 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1380 MHz
Number of transistorsno data10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)13 Watt160 Watt
Texture fill rate4.000165.6 ×2
Floating-point processing power0.064 TFLOPS5.299 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs164 ×2
TMUs10120 ×2
Tensor Coresno data240 ×2
Ray Tracing Coresno data30 ×2
L1 Cacheno data1.9 MB
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared6 GB ×2
Memory bus widthSystem Shared192 Bit ×2
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data336.0 GB/s ×2
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.7
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-7.5
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2008 27 May 2019
Chip lithography 65 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 13 Watt 160 Watt

GMA X4500M has 1130.8% lower power consumption.

RTX 3000 X2 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, and a 441.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GMA X4500M and Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GMA X4500M is a notebook graphics card while Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel GMA X4500M
GMA X4500M
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile
Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 11 votes

Rate GMA X4500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GMA X4500M or Quadro RTX 3000 X2 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.