GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER vs GMA X4500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGeneration 5.0 (2008)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameEaglelakeGB203
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 June 2008 (17 years ago)2026
Launch price (MSRP)no data$999

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8010752
Core clock speed533 MHz2295 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2617 MHz
Number of transistorsno data45,600 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)13 Watt415 Watt
Texture fill rate2.132879.3
Floating-point processing powerno data56.28 TFLOPS
ROPs4112
TMUs4336
Tensor Coresno data336
Ray Tracing Coresno data84
L1 Cacheno data10.5 MB
L2 Cacheno data64 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data304 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR7
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared24 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1.02 TB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.8
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 65 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 13 Watt 415 Watt

GMA X4500 has 3092.3% lower power consumption.

RTX 5080 SUPER, on the other hand, has a 1200% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GMA X4500 and GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel GMA X4500
GMA X4500
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER
GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 362 votes

Rate GMA X4500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 97 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GMA X4500 or GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.