GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q vs GMA X3500

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGeneration 4.0 (2006−2007)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameBearlakeGA104
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 August 2007 (18 years ago)12 January 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data6144
Core clock speed667 MHz780 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1245 MHz
Number of transistorsno data17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)13 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate5.336239.0
Floating-point processing powerno data15.3 TFLOPS
ROPs196
TMUs8192
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Coresno data48
L1 Cacheno data6 MB
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data384.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model3.06.5
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 August 2007 12 January 2021
Chip lithography 90 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 13 Watt 80 Watt

GMA X3500 has 515.4% lower power consumption.

RTX 3080 Max-Q, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, and a 1025% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GMA X3500 and GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GMA X3500 is a desktop graphics card while GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel GMA X3500
GMA X3500
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 13 votes

Rate GMA X3500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 41 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GMA X3500 or GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.