RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile vs GMA X3100

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated135
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data25.31
ArchitectureGeneration 4.0 (2006−2007)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameBroadwaterAD106
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date9 May 2007 (18 years ago)21 March 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data4608
Core clock speed500 MHz1395 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1695 MHz
Number of transistorsno data22,900 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)13 Watt115 Watt
Texture fill rate4.000244.1
Floating-point processing powerno data15.62 TFLOPS
ROPs148
TMUs8144
Tensor Coresno data144
Ray Tracing Coresno data36
L1 Cacheno data4.5 MB
L2 Cacheno data32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data256.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model3.06.8
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 May 2007 21 March 2023
Chip lithography 90 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 13 Watt 115 Watt

GMA X3100 has 784.6% lower power consumption.

RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 15 years, and a 1700% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GMA X3100 and RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GMA X3100 is a notebook graphics card while RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel GMA X3100
GMA X3100
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 102 votes

Rate GMA X3100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 11 votes

Rate RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GMA X3100 or RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.