GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 3 vs GMA X3100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGeneration 4.0 (2006−2007)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameBroadwaterG96C
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date9 May 2007 (18 years ago)29 July 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data32
Core clock speed500 MHz550 MHz
Number of transistorsno data314 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)13 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate4.0008.800
Floating-point processing powerno data0.0896 TFLOPS
ROPs18
TMUs816
L2 Cacheno data32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data175 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared512 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared800 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data25.6 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model3.04.0
OpenGL2.03.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 May 2007 29 July 2008
Chip lithography 90 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 13 Watt 50 Watt

GMA X3100 has 284.6% lower power consumption.

9500 GT Rev. 3, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 63.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GMA X3100 and GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 3. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GMA X3100 is a notebook graphics card while GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 3 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel GMA X3100
GMA X3100
NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 3
GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 3

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 102 votes

Rate GMA X3100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GMA X3100 or GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 3, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.