UHD Graphics 770 vs GMA 900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated625
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data28.76
ArchitectureGeneration 3.0 (2005)Generation 12.2 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameAlvisoRaptor Lake GT1
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date2005 (20 years ago)27 September 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data256
Core clock speed333 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1650 MHz
Manufacturing process technology130 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rate1.33226.40
Floating-point processing powerno data0.8448 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs416

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceFSBRing Bus
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentMotherboard Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c12 (12_1)
Shader Model3.06.6
OpenGL1.44.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 130 nm 10 nm

UHD Graphics 770 has a 1200% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GMA 900 and UHD Graphics 770. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GMA 900 is a notebook graphics card while UHD Graphics 770 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel GMA 900
GMA 900
Intel UHD Graphics 770
UHD Graphics 770

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 27 votes

Rate GMA 900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 1385 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GMA 900 or UHD Graphics 770, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.