UHD Graphics 617 vs GMA 3650

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated929
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data10.57
ArchitecturePowerVR SGX545 (2008−2010)Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameCedarviewAmber Lake GT2
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 October 2008 (17 years ago)7 November 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32192
Core clock speed640 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1050 MHz
Manufacturing process technology65 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)13 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate2.56025.20
Floating-point processing power0.04096 TFLOPS0.4032 TFLOPS
ROPs13
TMUs424

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIRing Bus

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.112 (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.4
OpenGLES 2.04.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2008 7 November 2018
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 13 Watt 15 Watt

GMA 3650 has 15% lower power consumption.

UHD Graphics 617, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, and a 364% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GMA 3650 and UHD Graphics 617. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 5 votes

Rate GMA 3650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 81 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 617 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GMA 3650 or UHD Graphics 617, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.