A10G vs GMA 3650

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated183
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data16.68
ArchitecturePowerVR SGX545 (2008−2010)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameCedarviewGA102
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 October 2008 (17 years ago)12 April 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores329216
Core clock speed640 MHz1320 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1710 MHz
Number of transistorsno data28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)13 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate2.560492.5
Floating-point processing power0.04096 TFLOPS31.52 TFLOPS
ROPs196
TMUs4288
Tensor Coresno data288
Ray Tracing Coresno data72
L1 Cacheno data9 MB
L2 Cacheno data6 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared12 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared384 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1563 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data600.2 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.6
OpenGLES 2.04.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2008 12 April 2021
Chip lithography 65 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 13 Watt 150 Watt

GMA 3650 has 1053.8% lower power consumption.

A10G, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, and a 712.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GMA 3650 and A10G. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GMA 3650 is a notebook graphics card while A10G is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel GMA 3650
GMA 3650
NVIDIA A10G
A10G

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 4 votes

Rate GMA 3650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 49 votes

Rate A10G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GMA 3650 or A10G, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.