Radeon RX Vega 9 vs GMA 3150

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking	1605	673
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	no data	25.82
Architecture	Generation 4.0 (2006−2007)	Vega (2017−2020)
GPU code name	Pineview	Vega Raven Ridge
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	9 May 2007 (18 years ago)	26 October 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	16	576
Core clock speed	400 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	no data	1300 MHz
Number of transistors	123 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	45 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	13 Watt	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	0.8	no data
Floating-point processing power	0.0128 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	1	no data
TMUs	2	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface

PCI

no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	no data
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	no data
Memory bus width	System Shared	no data
Memory clock speed	System Shared	no data
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	9.0c	12_1
Shader Model	3.0	no data
OpenGL	2.0	no data
OpenCL	N/A	no data
Vulkan	N/A	-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

no data

18

FPS performance in popular games

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	9 May 2007	26 October 2017
Chip lithography	45 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	13 Watt	15 Watt

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---