Radeon RX 6700 XT vs GMA 3150

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking	1535	52
Place by popularity	not in top-100	92
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	56.82
Power efficiency	no data	15.45
Architecture	Generation 4.0 (2006−2007)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code name	Pineview	Navi 22
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	9 May 2007 (17 years ago)	3 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$479

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	16	2560
Core clock speed	400 MHz	2321 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	2581 MHz
Number of transistors	123 million	17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	45 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	13 Watt	230 Watt
Texture fill rate	0.8	413.0
Floating-point processing power	0.0128 TFLOPS	13.21 TFLOPS
ROPs	1	64
TMUs	2	160
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCI	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	12 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	384.0 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	9.0c	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	3.0	6.5
OpenGL	2.0	4.6
OpenCL	N/A	2.1
Vulkan	N/A	1.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

---

---

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	no data	154
1440p	no data	84
4K	no data	49

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	3.11
1440p	no data	5.70
4K	no data	9.78

FPS performance in popular games

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	9 May 2007	3 March 2021
Chip lithography	45 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	13 Watt	230 Watt

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---