Matrox Productiva G100 vs GMA 3150

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1528not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.05no data
ArchitectureGeneration 4.0 (2006−2007)G100 (1998)
GPU code namePineviewTwister
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date9 May 2007 (17 years ago)1998 (26 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16no data
Core clock speed400 MHz41 MHz
Number of transistors123 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology45 nm350 nm
Power consumption (TDP)13 Wattno data
Texture fill rate0.80.04
Floating-point processing power0.0128 TFLOPSno data
ROPs11
TMUs21

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIAGP 2x
Lengthno data150 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSGR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared62 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data496.0 MB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c3.0
Shader Model3.0no data
OpenGL2.0None
OpenCLN/ANone
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 45 nm 350 nm

GMA 3150 has a 677.8% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GMA 3150 and Matrox Productiva G100. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GMA 3150 is a notebook card while Matrox Productiva G100 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel GMA 3150
GMA 3150
Matrox Productiva G100
Productiva G100

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 141 vote

Rate GMA 3150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 9 votes

Rate Matrox Productiva G100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.