GeForce RTX 3070 Ti vs GMA 3150

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking	1547	38
Place by popularity	not in top-100	83
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	52.72
Power efficiency	no data	14.30
Architecture	Generation 4.0 (2006−2007)	Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code name	Pineview	GA104
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	9 May 2007 (17 years ago)	31 May 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	16	6144
Core clock speed	400 MHz	1575 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1770 MHz
Number of transistors	123 million	17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	45 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	13 Watt	290 Watt
Texture fill rate	0.8	339.8
Floating-point processing power	0.0128 TFLOPS	21.75 TFLOPS
ROPs	1	96
TMUs	2	192
Tensor Cores	no data	192
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCI	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	8 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	1188 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	608.3 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-
Resizable BAR	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI	-	+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	9.0c	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	3.0	6.6
OpenGL	2.0	4.6
OpenCL	N/A	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.2
CUDA	-	8.6
DLSS	-	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

---

---

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	no data	172
1440p	no data	94
4K	no data	59

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	3.48
1440p	no data	6.37
4K	no data	10.15

FPS performance in popular games

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	9 May 2007	31 May 2021
Chip lithography	45 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	13 Watt	290 Watt

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---