GeForce 8400 SE vs GMA 3150
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1592 | 1476 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 0.25 |
| Architecture | Generation 4.0 (2006−2007) | Tesla (2006−2010) |
| GPU code name | Pineview | G86S |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 9 May 2007 (18 years ago) | 1 August 2008 (17 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 16 | 16 |
| Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 459 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 123 million | 210 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 80 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 13 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 0.8 | 3.672 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.0128 TFLOPS | 0.02938 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 1 | 4 |
| TMUs | 2 | 8 |
| L2 Cache | no data | 16 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCI | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 168 mm |
| Width | no data | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | System Shared | DDR2 |
| Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 128 MB |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | System Shared | 400 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 6.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | no data |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 9.0c | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 2.0 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | N/A | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | - | 1.1 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 9 May 2007 | 1 August 2008 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 80 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 13 Watt | 50 Watt |
GMA 3150 has a 77.8% more advanced lithography process, and 284.6% lower power consumption.
8400 SE, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.
We couldn't decide between GMA 3150 and GeForce 8400 SE. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that GMA 3150 is a notebook graphics card while GeForce 8400 SE is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
