Iris Plus Graphics vs GMA 3100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated720
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data21.92
ArchitectureGeneration 4.0 (2006−2007)Generation 11.0 (2019−2021)
GPU code nameBearlakeIce Lake GT2
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date9 May 2007 (18 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data512
Core clock speed400 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1000 MHz
Manufacturing process technology90 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)13 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate1.60032.00
Floating-point processing powerno data1.024 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs432

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x1
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c12 (12_1)
Shader Model3.0no data
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 90 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 13 Watt 15 Watt

GMA 3100 has 15% lower power consumption.

Iris Plus Graphics, on the other hand, has a 800% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GMA 3100 and Iris Plus Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GMA 3100 is a notebook graphics card while Iris Plus Graphics is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 328 votes

Rate GMA 3100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 491 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GMA 3100 or Iris Plus Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.