GeForce GTX 1660 vs GMA 3100
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 223 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 47 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 38.29 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 17.62 |
| Architecture | Generation 4.0 (2006−2007) | Turing (2018−2022) |
| GPU code name | Bearlake | TU116 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 9 May 2007 (18 years ago) | 14 March 2019 (6 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $219 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | no data | 1408 |
| Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 1530 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1785 MHz |
| Number of transistors | no data | 6,600 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 13 Watt | 120 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 1.600 | 157.1 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 5.027 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 4 | 48 |
| TMUs | 4 | 88 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 229 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 1x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 6 GB |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | System Shared | 2001 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 192.1 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| HDMI | - | + |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 9.0c | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 3.0 | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | 2.0 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | N/A | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | - | 7.5 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 9 May 2007 | 14 March 2019 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 13 Watt | 120 Watt |
GMA 3100 has 823.1% lower power consumption.
GTX 1660, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, and a 650% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between GMA 3100 and GeForce GTX 1660. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that GMA 3100 is a notebook graphics card while GeForce GTX 1660 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
