RTX A40 vs GMA 3000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGeneration 4.0 (2006−2007)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameBroadwaterGA102
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 June 2006 (19 years ago)5 October 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data10752
Core clock speed400 MHz1305 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1755 MHz
Number of transistorsno data28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)13 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate1.600589.7
Floating-point processing powerno data37.74 TFLOPS
ROPs4112
TMUs4336
Tensor Coresno data336
Ray Tracing Coresno data84
L1 Cacheno data10.5 MB
L2 Cacheno data6 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared48 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared384 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1812 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data695.8 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs3x DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model3.06.5
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2006 5 October 2020
Chip lithography 90 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 13 Watt 300 Watt

GMA 3000 has 2208% lower power consumption.

RTX A40, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 14 years, and a 1025% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GMA 3000 and RTX A40. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GMA 3000 is a notebook graphics card while RTX A40 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 47 votes

Rate GMA 3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.4 402 votes

Rate RTX A40 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GMA 3000 or RTX A40, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.