Radeon RX 560D vs FireStream 9370

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking630not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.05no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameCypressPolaris 21
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date23 June 2010 (15 years ago)4 July 2017 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$99

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1600896
Core clock speed825 MHz1090 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1175 MHz
Number of transistors2,154 million3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate66.0065.80
Floating-point processing power2.64 TFLOPS2.106 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs8056
L1 Cache160 KB224 KB
L2 Cache512 KB1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length267 mm170 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1150 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth147.2 GB/s96 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.06.4
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 June 2010 4 July 2017
Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 65 Watt

RX 560D has an age advantage of 7 years, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 246.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FireStream 9370 and Radeon RX 560D. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FireStream 9370 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 560D is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FireStream 9370
FireStream 9370
AMD Radeon RX 560D
Radeon RX 560D

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 8 votes

Rate FireStream 9370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 94 votes

Rate Radeon RX 560D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FireStream 9370 or Radeon RX 560D, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.