ATI All-In-Wonder 9200 SE vs FireStream 9370

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking642not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.07no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameCypressRV280
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date23 June 2010 (15 years ago)26 January 2004 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1600no data
Core clock speed825 MHz250 MHz
Number of transistors2,154 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Wattno data
Texture fill rate66.001.000
Floating-point processing power2.64 TFLOPSno data
ROPs324
TMUs804
L1 Cache160 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 8x
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount4 GB128 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1150 MHz164 MHz
Memory bandwidth147.2 GB/s2.624 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DisplayPort1x VGA, 2x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)8.1
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.41.4
OpenCL1.2N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 June 2010 26 January 2004
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 150 nm

FireStream 9370 has an age advantage of 6 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 275% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FireStream 9370 and All-In-Wonder 9200 SE. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FireStream 9370 is a workstation graphics card while All-In-Wonder 9200 SE is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FireStream 9370
FireStream 9370
ATI All-In-Wonder 9200 SE
All-In-Wonder 9200 SE

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 8 votes

Rate FireStream 9370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate All-In-Wonder 9200 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FireStream 9370 or All-In-Wonder 9200 SE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.