Radeon RX 6900 vs FireStream 9350

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated35
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data19.25
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameCypressNavi 21
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date1 June 2010 (15 years ago)28 October 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores14404608
Core clock speed700 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data2105 MHz
Number of transistors2,154 million23,000 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt255 Watt
Texture fill rate50.40606.2
Floating-point processing power2.016 TFLOPS19.4 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs72288
L1 Cache144 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length241 mmno data
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz16 GB/s
Memory bandwidth128.0 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DisplayPort1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.5
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.0
VulkanN/A1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2010 28 October 2020
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 255 Watt

FireStream 9350 has 70% lower power consumption.

RX 6900, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FireStream 9350 and Radeon RX 6900. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FireStream 9350 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 6900 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FireStream 9350
FireStream 9350
AMD Radeon RX 6900
Radeon RX 6900

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate FireStream 9350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 90 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FireStream 9350 or Radeon RX 6900, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.