Radeon 530X vs FireStream 9350

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameCypressMeso
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date1 June 2010 (16 years ago)18 April 2017 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1440384
Core clock speed700 MHz730 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1021 MHz
Number of transistors2,154 million1,040 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate50.4024.50
Floating-point processing power2.016 TFLOPSno data
ROPs328
TMUs7224
L1 Cache144 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length241 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz4000 MHz
Memory bandwidth128.0 GB/s32 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12.0
Shader Model5.05.0
OpenGL4.44.5
OpenCL1.22.0
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2010 18 April 2017
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 50 Watt

Radeon 530X has an age advantage of 6 years, a 43% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FireStream 9350 and Radeon 530X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FireStream 9350 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon 530X is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate FireStream 9350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 8 votes

Rate Radeon 530X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FireStream 9350 or Radeon 530X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.