Arc 140T Mobile vs FireStream 9350

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Xe+ (2025)
GPU code nameCypressArrow Lake-H
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date1 June 2010 (15 years ago)13 January 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores14401024
Core clock speed700 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2350 MHz
Number of transistors2,154 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate50.40150.4
Floating-point processing power2.016 TFLOPS4.813 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs7264
Tensor Coresno data128
Ray Tracing Coresno data8
L1 Cache144 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length241 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1000 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth128.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.8
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.23.0
VulkanN/A1.3
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2010 13 January 2025
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 35 Watt

Arc 140T Mobile has an age advantage of 14 years, a 700% more advanced lithography process, and 328.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FireStream 9350 and Arc 140T Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FireStream 9350 is a workstation graphics card while Arc 140T Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FireStream 9350
FireStream 9350
Intel Arc 140T Mobile
Arc 140T Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate FireStream 9350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 49 votes

Rate Arc 140T Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FireStream 9350 or Arc 140T Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.