Radeon Vega 11 Embedded vs FireStream 9270

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking798not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.54no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameRV770Raven
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date13 November 2008 (17 years ago)13 February 2018 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores800704
Core clock speed750 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1300 MHz
Number of transistors956 million4,940 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)160 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate30.0057.20
Floating-point processing power1.2 TFLOPS1.83 TFLOPS
ROPs168
TMUs4044
L1 Cache160 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16IGP
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed900 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth115.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVINo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.4
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 November 2008 13 February 2018
Chip lithography 55 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 160 Watt 35 Watt

Vega 11 Embedded has an age advantage of 9 years, a 292.9% more advanced lithography process, and 357.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FireStream 9270 and Radeon Vega 11 Embedded. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FireStream 9270 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon Vega 11 Embedded is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FireStream 9270
FireStream 9270
AMD Radeon Vega 11 Embedded
Radeon Vega 11 Embedded

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate FireStream 9270 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 23 votes

Rate Radeon Vega 11 Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FireStream 9270 or Radeon Vega 11 Embedded, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.