Quadro NVS 280 AGP vs FireStream 9270

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking779not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.53no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameRV770NV34 A1
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date13 November 2008 (16 years ago)25 May 2004 (21 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores800no data
Core clock speed750 MHz275 MHz
Number of transistors956 million45 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)160 Watt13 Watt
Texture fill rate30.001.100
Floating-point processing power1.2 TFLOPSno data
ROPs164
TMUs404
L1 Cache160 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 8x
Lengthno data168 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount2 GB64 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz250 MHz
Memory bandwidth115.2 GB/s8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI1x DMS-59

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)9.0a
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.31.5 (2.1)
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 November 2008 25 May 2004
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 55 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 160 Watt 13 Watt

FireStream 9270 has an age advantage of 4 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 172.7% more advanced lithography process.

NVS 280 AGP, on the other hand, has 1130.8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FireStream 9270 and Quadro NVS 280 AGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FireStream 9270
FireStream 9270
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 280 AGP
Quadro NVS 280 AGP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate FireStream 9270 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Quadro NVS 280 AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FireStream 9270 or Quadro NVS 280 AGP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.