STG-2000 vs FireStream 9250

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking843not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.42no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)no data
GPU code nameRV770NV1
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date16 June 2008 (17 years ago)30 September 1995 (30 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$249

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores800no data
Core clock speed625 MHz75 MHz
Number of transistors956 million1 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm500 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt2 Watt
Texture fill rate25.000.08
Floating-point processing power1 TFLOPSno data
ROPs161
TMUs401
L1 Cache160 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCI
Lengthno data168 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3FPM
Maximum RAM amount1 GB1 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed993 MHz50 MHz
Memory bandwidth63.55 GB/s400.0 MB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI1x VGA, 1x DB13W3

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)1.0
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.3N/A
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 16 June 2008 30 September 1995
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 1 MB
Chip lithography 55 nm 500 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 2 Watt

FireStream 9250 has an age advantage of 12 years, a 102300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 809.1% more advanced lithography process.

STG-2000, on the other hand, has 7400% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FireStream 9250 and STG-2000. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FireStream 9250 is a workstation graphics card while STG-2000 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FireStream 9250
FireStream 9250
NVIDIA STG-2000
STG-2000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 6 votes

Rate FireStream 9250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 88 votes

Rate STG-2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FireStream 9250 or STG-2000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.