RTX A40 vs FireStream 9250

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking840not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.43no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameRV770GA102
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date16 June 2008 (17 years ago)5 October 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores80010752
Core clock speed625 MHz1305 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1755 MHz
Number of transistors956 million28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate25.00589.7
Floating-point processing power1 TFLOPS37.74 TFLOPS
ROPs16112
TMUs40336
Tensor Coresno data336
Ray Tracing Coresno data84
L1 Cache160 KB10.5 MB
L2 Cache256 KB6 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB48 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed993 MHz1812 MHz
Memory bandwidth63.55 GB/s695.8 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI3x DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.5
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 16 June 2008 5 October 2020
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 48 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 300 Watt

FireStream 9250 has 100% lower power consumption.

RTX A40, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 587.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FireStream 9250 and RTX A40. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FireStream 9250
FireStream 9250
NVIDIA RTX A40
RTX A40

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 6 votes

Rate FireStream 9250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.4 402 votes

Rate RTX A40 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FireStream 9250 or RTX A40, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.