GeForce RTX 2050 Max-Q vs FireStream 9250

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking839not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-10085
Power efficiency1.42no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameRV770GA107
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date16 June 2008 (17 years ago)17 December 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8002048
Core clock speed625 MHz832 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1155 MHz
Number of transistors956 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology55 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rate25.0073.92
Floating-point processing power1 TFLOPS4.731 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs4064
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data32
L1 Cache160 KB1 MB
L2 Cache256 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed993 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth63.55 GB/s96 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.7
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 16 June 2008 17 December 2021
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 30 Watt

RTX 2050 Max-Q has an age advantage of 13 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 587.5% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FireStream 9250 and GeForce RTX 2050 Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FireStream 9250 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 2050 Max-Q is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FireStream 9250
FireStream 9250
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2050 Max-Q

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 6 votes

Rate FireStream 9250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 257 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2050 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FireStream 9250 or GeForce RTX 2050 Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.