GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM vs FireStream 9170

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1001not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.13no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameRV670GK106
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date8 November 2007 (18 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320960
Core clock speed800 MHz1033 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1098 MHz
Number of transistors666 million2,540 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate12.8087.84
Floating-point processing power0.512 TFLOPSno data
ROPs1624
TMUs1680
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz6 GB/s
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s192.3 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model4.16.5 (5.1)
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.2.175
CUDA-3.0

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 55 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 150 Watt

FireStream 9170 has 42.9% lower power consumption.

GTX 750 Ti OEM, on the other hand, has a 96.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FireStream 9170 and GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FireStream 9170 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FireStream 9170
FireStream 9170
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM
GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 2 votes

Rate FireStream 9170 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 158 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FireStream 9170 or GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.