GeForce GT 1030 DDR4 vs FireStream 9170

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking938not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.12no data
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameRV670GP108
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date8 November 2007 (17 years ago)12 March 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$79

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320384
Core clock speed800 MHz1152 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1379 MHz
Number of transistors666 million1,800 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt20 Watt
Texture fill rate12.8033.10
Floating-point processing power0.512 TFLOPS1.059 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs1624

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x4
Lengthno data145 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR4
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1050 MHz
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s16.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x HDMI
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.1 (10_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.4
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 November 2007 12 March 2018
Chip lithography 55 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 20 Watt

GT 1030 DDR4 has an age advantage of 10 years, a 292.9% more advanced lithography process, and 425% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FireStream 9170 and GeForce GT 1030 DDR4. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FireStream 9170 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GT 1030 DDR4 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FireStream 9170
FireStream 9170
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 DDR4
GeForce GT 1030 DDR4

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 2 votes

Rate FireStream 9170 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 977 votes

Rate GeForce GT 1030 DDR4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.