Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950 vs FirePro W9100

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking331not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.19no data
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Gen. 3 (2005)
GPU code nameHawaiiGMA 950
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date26 March 2014 (12 years ago)1 March 2005 (21 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores28164
Core clock speed930 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data250 MHz
Number of transistors6,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)750 Watt7 Watt
Texture fill rate163.7no data
Floating-point processing power5.238 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64no data
TMUs176no data
L1 Cache704 KBno data
L2 Cache1024 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length275 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Form factorfull height / full lengthno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount16 GBno data
Memory bus width512 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1250 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth320 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x S-Videono data
StereoOutput3D+-
Dual-link DVI support+-
HD сomponent video output+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)no data
Shader Model6.3no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 March 2014 1 March 2005
Chip lithography 28 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 750 Watt 7 Watt

FirePro W9100 has an age advantage of 9 years, and a 364% more advanced lithography process.

Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950, on the other hand, has 10614% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro W9100 and Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro W9100 is a workstation graphics card while Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 19 votes

Rate FirePro W9100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 83 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro W9100 or Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.