Riva TNT2 M64 vs FirePro W9000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking395not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.40no data
Power efficiency4.13no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Fahrenheit (1998−2000)
GPU code nameTahitiNV5 B6
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date14 June 2012 (13 years ago)12 October 1999 (26 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048no data
Core clock speed975 MHz125 MHz
Number of transistors4,313 million15 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm250 nm
Power consumption (TDP)350 Wattno data
Texture fill rate124.80.25
Floating-point processing power3.994 TFLOPSno data
ROPs322
TMUs1282
L1 Cache512 KBno data
L2 Cache768 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 4x
Length279 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Form factorfull height / full lengthno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5SDR
Maximum RAM amount6 GB16 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1375 MHz143 MHz
Memory bandwidth264 GB/s1.144 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDI1x VGA
StereoOutput3D+-
Dual-link DVI support+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)6.0
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.61.2
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 June 2012 12 October 1999
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 16 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 250 nm

FirePro W9000 has an age advantage of 12 years, a 38300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 793% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro W9000 and Riva TNT2 M64. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro W9000 is a workstation graphics card while Riva TNT2 M64 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 5 votes

Rate FirePro W9000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 38 votes

Rate Riva TNT2 M64 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro W9000 or Riva TNT2 M64, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.