ATI FirePro V8700 vs FirePro W9000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking340not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.94no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameTahitiRV770
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date14 June 2012 (12 years ago)11 September 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,999 $1,499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048800
Core clock speed975 MHz750 MHz
Number of transistors4,313 million956 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)350 Watt151 Watt
Texture fill rate124.830.00
Floating-point processing power3.994 gflops1.2 gflops
ROPs3216
TMUs12840

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length279 mm254 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Form factorfull height / full lengthno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount6 GB1 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed5500 MHz3400 MHz
Memory bandwidth264 GB/s108.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDI1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video
StereoOutput3D+-
Dual-link DVI support+-

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model5.14.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 June 2012 11 September 2008
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 350 Watt 151 Watt

FirePro W9000 has an age advantage of 3 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 96.4% more advanced lithography process.

ATI V8700, on the other hand, has 131.8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro W9000 and FirePro V8700. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro W9000
FirePro W9000
ATI FirePro V8700
FirePro V8700

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 5 votes

Rate FirePro W9000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 6 votes

Rate FirePro V8700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.