GeForce 405M vs FirePro W7170M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking532not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.80no data
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameAmethystGT218
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date2 October 2015 (10 years ago)5 January 2011 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores204816
Core clock speed723 MHz606 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million260 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt14 Watt
Texture fill rate92.544.848
Floating-point processing power2.961 TFLOPS0.03878 TFLOPS
Gigaflopsno data73
ROPs324
TMUs1288
L1 Cache512 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KB32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GBUp to 512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHzUp to 800 (DDR3), Up to 800 (GDDR3) MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s25.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsDisplayPort, HDMI, VGA, Dual Link DVI, Single Link DVI
Multi monitor supportno data+
Eyefinity+-
HDMI-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-
Power managementno data8.0

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 API
Shader Model6.34.1
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 October 2015 5 January 2011
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 14 Watt

W7170M has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 43% more advanced lithography process.

GeForce 405M, on the other hand, has 614% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro W7170M and GeForce 405M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro W7170M is a mobile workstation graphics card while GeForce 405M is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 13 votes

Rate FirePro W7170M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 17 votes

Rate GeForce 405M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro W7170M or GeForce 405M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.