RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs FirePro W6170M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated48
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data34.00
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameSaturnAD104
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date25 August 2014 (11 years ago)9 August 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7686144
Core clock speed1075 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2175 MHz
Number of transistors2,080 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data130 Watt
Texture fill rate51.60417.6
Floating-point processing power1.651 TFLOPS26.73 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs48192
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Coresno data48
L1 Cache192 KB6 MB
L2 Cache256 KB48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data245 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB20 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit160 Bit
Memory clock speed1375 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth88 GB/s360.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.36.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 August 2014 9 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 20 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm

RTX 4000 Ada Generation has an age advantage of 8 years, a 900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro W6170M and RTX 4000 Ada Generation. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro W6170M is a mobile workstation graphics card while RTX 4000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro W6170M
FirePro W6170M
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation
RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate FirePro W6170M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 65 votes

Rate RTX 4000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro W6170M or RTX 4000 Ada Generation, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.