Iris Plus Graphics G4 vs FirePro W6150M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking652not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Generation 11.0 (2019−2021)
GPU code nameSaturnIce Lake GT2
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date12 November 2015 (10 years ago)29 May 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768384
Core clock speed1075 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1050 MHz
Number of transistors2,080 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rate51.6025.20
Floating-point processing power1.651 TFLOPS0.8064 TFLOPS
ROPs168
TMUs4824
L1 Cache192 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x1
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1375 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth88 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.36.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.97

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 November 2015 29 May 2019
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm

Iris Plus Graphics G4 has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro W6150M and Iris Plus Graphics G4. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro W6150M is a mobile workstation graphics card while Iris Plus Graphics G4 is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate FirePro W6150M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 9 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics G4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro W6150M or Iris Plus Graphics G4, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.