GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q vs FirePro W600

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking741not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.21no data
Power efficiency4.16no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameCape VerdeGA106
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date13 June 2012 (13 years ago)12 January 2021 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5123840
Core clock speed750 MHz817 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1282 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 million13,250 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt60 Watt
Texture fill rate24.00153.8
Floating-point processing power0.768 TFLOPS9.846 TFLOPS
ROPs1648
TMUs32120
Tensor Coresno data120
Ray Tracing Coresno data30
L1 Cache128 KB3.8 MB
L2 Cache256 KB3 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length163 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB6 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors6x mini-DisplayPortNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 June 2012 12 January 2021
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 60 Watt

RTX 3060 Max-Q has an age advantage of 8 years, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 25% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro W600 and GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro W600 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 21 votes

Rate FirePro W600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 194 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro W600 or GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.