NVIDIA Quadro 2000M vs AMD FirePro W5130M

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

W5130M
3.64
+81.1%

FirePro W5130M outperforms Quadro 2000M by 81% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking674839
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money0.120.25
ArchitectureGCN (2011−2017)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameTropoFermi
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date2 October 2015 (8 years old)22 February 2011 (13 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$46.56
Current price$1041 $135 (2.9x MSRP)
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro 2000M has 108% better value for money than W5130M.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512192
Core clock speedno data550 MHz
Boost clock speed925 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,500 million1,170 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data55 Watt
Texture fill rate29.6017.60
Floating-point performance947.2 gflops422.4 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on FirePro W5130M and Quadro 2000M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedmedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-A (3.0)

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed4000 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s28.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Eyefinity+no data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDAno data2.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

W5130M 3.64
+81.1%
Quadro 2000M 2.01

FirePro W5130M outperforms Quadro 2000M by 81% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

W5130M 1409
+80.4%
Quadro 2000M 781

FirePro W5130M outperforms Quadro 2000M by 80% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

W5130M 3106
+146%
Quadro 2000M 1261

FirePro W5130M outperforms Quadro 2000M by 146% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

W5130M 5224
+53.1%
Quadro 2000M 3412

FirePro W5130M outperforms Quadro 2000M by 53% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD25
−52%
38
+52%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Battlefield 5 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+27.3%
10−12
−27.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
Hitman 3 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Horizon Zero Dawn 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Battlefield 5 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+27.3%
10−12
−27.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
Hitman 3 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Horizon Zero Dawn 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10
+100%
5−6
−100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Battlefield 5 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Hitman 3 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Metro Exodus 2−3 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Hitman 3 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2 0−1

This is how W5130M and Quadro 2000M compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • Quadro 2000M is 52% faster than W5130M

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Far Cry 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the W5130M is 500% faster than the Quadro 2000M.

All in all, in popular games:

  • W5130M is ahead in 46 tests (96%)
  • there's a draw in 2 tests (4%)

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 3.64 2.01
Recency 2 October 2015 22 February 2011
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm

The FirePro W5130M is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro 2000M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro W5130M
FirePro W5130M
NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
Quadro 2000M

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 53 votes

Rate AMD FirePro W5130M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 57 votes

Rate NVIDIA Quadro 2000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.