FirePro W5100 vs Radeon RX Vega 11

Place in performance ranking	571	485
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Value for money	0.77	2.91
Architecture	Vega (2017−2021)	GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code name	Vega Raven Ridge	Bonaire
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	26 October 2017 (6 years old)	31 March 2014 (10 years old)
Current price	$475	$220

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

FirePro W5100 has 278% better value for money than RX Vega 11.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	704	768
Core clock speed	no data	930 MHz
Boost clock speed	1240 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	4,940 million	2,080 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	61.60	44.64
Floating-point performance	1,760 gflops	1,428 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	no data	PCIe 3.0
Interface	IGP	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	no data	171 mm
Width	IGP	1-slot
Form factor	no data	full height / half length
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	4 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	96 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	4x DisplayPort
StereoOutput3D	no data	1
DisplayPort count	no data	4
Dual-link DVI support	no data	1
HD сomponent video output	no data	1

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	6.4	6.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	2.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX Vega 11 5.47

FirePro W5100 7.78
+42.2%

FirePro W5100 outperforms Radeon RX Vega 11 by 42% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RX Vega 11 2120

FirePro W5100 3014
+42.2%

FirePro W5100 outperforms Radeon RX Vega 11 by 42% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	28 −25%	35−40 +25%
1440p	6 −33.3%	8−9 +33.3%
4K	12 −33.3%	16−18 +33.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

9−10
−33.3%

12−14

+33.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	20 −35%	27−30 +35%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 −33.3%	8−9 +33.3%
Battlefield 5	31 −29%	40−45 +29%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 −41.2%	24−27 +41.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −33.3%	12−14 +33.3%
Far Cry 5	19 −42.1%	27−30 +42.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	18 −33.3%	24−27 +33.3%
Forza Horizon 4	38 −31.6%	50−55 +31.6%
Hitman 3	12−14 −33.3%	16−18 +33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 −40%	14−16 +40%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11 −40%	14−16 +40%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	19 −42.1%	27−30 +42.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	8−9 −25%	10−11 +25%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16 −31.3%	21−24 +31.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 −33.3%	8−9 +33.3%
Battlefield 5	26 −34.6%	35−40 +34.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 −41.2%	24−27 +41.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −33.3%	12−14 +33.3%
Far Cry 5	18 −33.3%	24−27 +33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	16 −31.3%	21−24 +31.3%
Forza Horizon 4	35 −28.6%	45−50 +28.6%
Hitman 3	12−14 −33.3%	16−18 +33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 −40%	14−16 +40%
Metro Exodus	9 −33.3%	12−14 +33.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11 −40%	14−16 +40%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16 −31.3%	21−24 +31.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14 −28.6%	18−20 +28.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	8−9 −25%	10−11 +25%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	11 −27.3%	14−16 +27.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 −33.3%	8−9 +33.3%
Battlefield 5	25 −40%	35−40 +40%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −33.3%	12−14 +33.3%
Far Cry 5	17 −41.2%	24−27 +41.2%
Far Cry New Dawn	16 −31.3%	21−24 +31.3%
Forza Horizon 4	29 −37.9%	40−45 +37.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10 −40%	14−16 +40%
Watch Dogs: Legion	8−9 −25%	10−11 +25%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	8−9 −25%	10−11 +25%
Hitman 3	9−10 −33.3%	12−14 +33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −33.3%	16−18 +33.3%
Metro Exodus	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 −33.3%	12−14 +33.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1
Battlefield 5	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −25%	10−11 +25%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 −40%	7−8 +40%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 −28.6%	9−10 +28.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −40%	7−8 +40%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Hitman 3	5−6 −40%	7−8 +40%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −25%	10−11 +25%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4 −25%	5−6 +25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5 −40%	7−8 +40%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Battlefield 5	8 −25%	10−11 +25%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	5−6 −40%	7−8 +40%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 −28.6%	9−10 +28.6%
Forza Horizon 4	12 −33.3%	16−18 +33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%

This is how RX Vega 11 and FirePro W5100 compete in popular games:

FirePro W5100 is 25% faster than RX Vega 11 in 1080p
FirePro W5100 is 33.3% faster than RX Vega 11 in 1440p
FirePro W5100 is 33.3% faster than RX Vega 11 in 4K

Advantages and disadvantages

Performance score	5.47	7.78
Recency	26 October 2017	31 March 2014
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	4 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	50 Watt