Matrox QID LP PCIe vs FirePro W5000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking585not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.62no data
Power efficiency7.27no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)MP (2004)
GPU code namePitcairnMP-A4
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date7 August 2012 (13 years ago)17 December 2004 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 $799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768no data
Core clock speed825 MHz250 MHz
Number of transistors2,800 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm0 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Wattno data
Texture fill rate39.602.000
Floating-point processing power1.267 TFLOPSno data
ROPs322
TMUs488
L1 Cache192 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length183 mm168 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Form factorfull height / half lengthno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount2 GB128 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz300 MHz
Memory bandwidth102.4 GB/s9.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort1x DVI
DisplayPort count2no data
Dual-link DVI support+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)8.1
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.61.5
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 August 2012 17 December 2004
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 128 MB

FirePro W5000 has an age advantage of 7 years, and a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between FirePro W5000 and Matrox QID LP PCIe. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro W5000 is a workstation graphics card while Matrox QID LP PCIe is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro W5000
FirePro W5000
Matrox QID LP PCIe
QID LP PCIe

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 130 votes

Rate FirePro W5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Matrox QID LP PCIe on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro W5000 or Matrox QID LP PCIe, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.