CMP 50HX vs FirePro W5000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking580not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.59no data
Power efficiency7.18no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code namePitcairnTU102
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date7 August 2012 (13 years ago)24 June 2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7683584
Core clock speed825 MHz1350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1545 MHz
Number of transistors2,800 million18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate39.60296.6
Floating-point processing power1.267 TFLOPS11.07 TFLOPS
ROPs3280
TMUs48192
Tensor Coresno data448
Ray Tracing Coresno data56
L1 Cache192 KB3.5 MB
L2 Cache512 KB5 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x4
Length183 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Form factorfull height / half lengthno data
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB10 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit320 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth102.4 GB/s560.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPortNo outputs
DisplayPort count2no data
Dual-link DVI support+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA-7.5
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

FirePro W5000 9999
CMP 50HX 55486
+455%

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

FirePro W5000 12432
CMP 50HX 47445
+282%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 August 2012 24 June 2021
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 10 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 250 Watt

FirePro W5000 has 233.3% lower power consumption.

CMP 50HX, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, a 400% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro W5000 and CMP 50HX. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro W5000
FirePro W5000
NVIDIA CMP 50HX
CMP 50HX

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 130 votes

Rate FirePro W5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 62 votes

Rate CMP 50HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro W5000 or CMP 50HX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.