GeForce GT 240M LE vs FirePro W5000 DVI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code namePitcairnG96C
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date25 February 2013 (12 years ago)15 January 2010 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores76832
Core clock speed825 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors2,800 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rate39.609.600
Floating-point processing power1.267 TFLOPS0.096 TFLOPS
ROPs328
TMUs4816
L1 Cache192 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KB32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length191 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Form factorfull height / half lengthno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR2
Maximum RAM amount2 GB512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth102.4 GB/s12.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVINo outputs
Dual-link DVI support+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 February 2013 15 January 2010
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 23 Watt

W5000 DVI has an age advantage of 3 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 96.4% more advanced lithography process.

GT 240M LE, on the other hand, has 226.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro W5000 DVI and GeForce GT 240M LE. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro W5000 DVI is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GT 240M LE is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro W5000 DVI
FirePro W5000 DVI
NVIDIA GeForce GT 240M LE
GeForce GT 240M LE

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 9 votes

Rate FirePro W5000 DVI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate GeForce GT 240M LE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro W5000 DVI or GeForce GT 240M LE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.