Xe DG1 vs FirePro W4300

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking528not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency10.46no data
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameBonaireDG1
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date1 December 2015 (8 years ago)2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768640
Core clock speed930 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1550 MHz
Number of transistors2,080 million5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rate44.6462.00
Floating-point processing power1.428 TFLOPS1.984 TFLOPS
ROPs1620
TMUs4840

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length171 mm164 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5LPDDR4X
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz2133 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s68.26 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.36.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 30 Watt

Xe DG1 has a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro W4300 and Xe DG1. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro W4300 is a workstation graphics card while Xe DG1 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro W4300
FirePro W4300
Intel Xe DG1
Xe DG1

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 23 votes

Rate FirePro W4300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 23 votes

Rate Xe DG1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.