Radeon RX 470D vs FirePro W4300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking591not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency10.60no data
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameBonaireEllesmere
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date1 December 2015 (9 years ago)21 October 2016 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7681792
Core clock speed930 MHz926 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1206 MHz
Number of transistors2,080 million5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate44.64135.1
Floating-point processing power1.428 TFLOPS4.322 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs48112
L1 Cache192 KB448 KB
L2 Cache256 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length171 mm241 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1650 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s211.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.36.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 December 2015 21 October 2016
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 120 Watt

FirePro W4300 has 140% lower power consumption.

RX 470D, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 months, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro W4300 and Radeon RX 470D. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro W4300 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 470D is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro W4300
FirePro W4300
AMD Radeon RX 470D
Radeon RX 470D

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 41 votes

Rate FirePro W4300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 148 votes

Rate Radeon RX 470D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro W4300 or Radeon RX 470D, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.