GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER vs FirePro W4300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking586not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency10.56no data
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameBonaireGB205
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date1 December 2015 (9 years ago)2026

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7686400
Core clock speed930 MHz2325 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2512 MHz
Number of transistors2,080 million31,100 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt275 Watt
Texture fill rate44.64502.4
Floating-point processing power1.428 TFLOPS32.15 TFLOPS
ROPs1680
TMUs48200
Tensor Coresno data200
Ray Tracing Coresno data50
L1 Cache192 KB6.3 MB
L2 Cache256 KB48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length171 mm245 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount4 GB18 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s672.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.36.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 18 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 275 Watt

FirePro W4300 has 450% lower power consumption.

RTX 5070 SUPER, on the other hand, has a 350% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro W4300 and GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro W4300 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro W4300
FirePro W4300
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER
GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 41 votes

Rate FirePro W4300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 75 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro W4300 or GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.