GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Max-Q vs FirePro W4300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking590not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency10.63no data
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameBonaireGA107
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date1 December 2015 (10 years ago)11 May 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7682560
Core clock speed930 MHz735 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1035 MHz
Number of transistors2,080 million8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate44.6482.80
Floating-point processing power1.428 TFLOPS5.299 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs4880
Tensor Coresno data80
Ray Tracing Coresno data20
L1 Cache192 KB2.5 MB
L2 Cache256 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length171 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1375 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s176.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.36.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 December 2015 11 May 2021
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 75 Watt

FirePro W4300 has 50% lower power consumption.

RTX 3050 Ti Max-Q, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro W4300 and GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro W4300 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Max-Q is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro W4300
FirePro W4300
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Max-Q
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Max-Q

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 41 votes

Rate FirePro W4300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 321 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro W4300 or GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.