AMD FirePro W4190M vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M
Comparison of FirePro W4190M and Quadro K2000M architecture, market type and release date.
FirePro W4190M and Quadro K2000M's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of FirePro W4190M and Quadro K2000M's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Core clock speed
Manufacturing process technology
Power consumption (TDP)
Texture fill rate
21.6 GTexel / s
23.84 GTexel / s
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on FirePro W4190M and Quadro K2000M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
Parameters of memory installed on FirePro W4190M and Quadro K2000M: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
Maximum RAM amount
Memory bus width
Memory clock speed
64 GB / s
28.8 GB / s
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on FirePro W4190M and Quadro K2000M.
Technological solutions and APIs supported by FirePro W4190M and Quadro K2000M. You'll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
APIs supported by FirePro W4190M and Quadro K2000M, sometimes including their particular versions.
DirectX 11.2, Shader 5.0
DirectX 11, Shader 5.0
Non-gaming benchmarks performance of FirePro W4190M and Quadro K2000M. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall benchmark performance
W4190M 1.66 +19.4%
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
W4190M 12317 +40.5%
3DMark Fire Strike Score
W4190M 1663 +59.9%
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
W4190M 1745 +66.8%
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
W4190M 2351 +30.8%
W4190M 1298 +20.1%
Rendering quality tests
GFXBench render quality
GFXBench high precision render quality
Cryptocurrency mining performance of FirePro W4190M and Quadro K2000M. Usually measured in megahashes per second.
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
Let's see how good FirePro W4190M and Quadro K2000M are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Advantages of AMD FirePro W4190M
19.4% faster in synthetic tests
Much newer (12 November 2015 vs 1 June 2012)
Higher memory bandwidth (64 vs 28.8 GB/s)
AMD PowerTune technology
AMD ZeroCore Power technology
Enduro (saves battery charge by automatically switching between an integrated and discrete AMD GPU depending on workload. Similar to NVIDIA Optimus)
PCI Express 3.0 x16
AMD App Acceleration
Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro K2000M
Optimus (lowers energy usage by automatically switching between integrated and discrete NVIDIA GPU. Similar to AMD Enduro)
PhysX (hardware acceleration of physical simulation engine named PhysX)
CUDA (Compute Unified Device Architecture - an API for video card computing power usage in tasks different from 3D graphics processing. Can be used for physics simulation for instance)
Vulkan (a contemporary API for graphics acceleration, based on now-discontinued Mantle)
So, FirePro W4190M or Quadro K2000M?
Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends AMD FirePro W4190M.
Should you still have questions on choice between FirePro W4190M and Quadro K2000M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.