GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q vs FirePro W4190M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking837not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameOpalGA104
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date12 November 2015 (10 years ago)12 January 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3845120
Core clock speed825 MHz780 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHz1290 MHz
Number of transistors950 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data80 Watt
Texture fill rate21.60206.4
Floating-point processing power0.6912 TFLOPS13.21 TFLOPS
ROPs880
TMUs24160
Tensor Coresno data160
Ray Tracing Coresno data40
L1 Cache96 KB5 MB
L2 Cache256 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s384.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 November 2015 12 January 2021
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm

RTX 3070 Max-Q has an age advantage of 5 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro W4190M and GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro W4190M is a mobile workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro W4190M
FirePro W4190M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 27 votes

Rate FirePro W4190M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 169 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro W4190M or GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.