GMA 3150 vs FirePro W4100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking7731597
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.47no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Generation 4.0 (2006−2007)
GPU code nameCape VerdePineview
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date13 August 2014 (11 years ago)9 May 2007 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51216
Core clock speed630 MHz400 MHz
Number of transistors1,500 million123 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt13 Watt
Texture fill rate20.160.8
Floating-point processing power0.6451 TFLOPS0.0128 TFLOPS
ROPs161
TMUs322
L1 Cache128 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCI
Length171 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Form factorlow profile / half lengthno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1000 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth72 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPortNo outputs
Dual-link DVI support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)9.0c
Shader Model5.13.0
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FirePro W4100 1488
+74300%
Samples: 242
GMA 3150 2
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD16no data
4K3no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 12−14 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9 no data

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 14−16 no data
Counter-Strike 2 12−14 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8 no data
Far Cry 5 10−11 no data
Fortnite 20−22 no data
Forza Horizon 4 16−18 no data
Forza Horizon 5 9−10 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16 no data
Valorant 50−55 no data

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 14−16 no data
Counter-Strike 2 12−14 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 65−70 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8 no data
Dota 2 30−35 no data
Far Cry 5 10−11 no data
Fortnite 20−22 no data
Forza Horizon 4 16−18 no data
Forza Horizon 5 9−10 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 10−11 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9 no data
Metro Exodus 6−7 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7 no data
Valorant 50−55 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 14−16 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8 no data
Dota 2 30−35 no data
Far Cry 5 10−11 no data
Forza Horizon 4 16−18 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12 no data
Valorant 50−55 no data

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 20−22 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 8−9 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 27−30 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2 no data
Metro Exodus 2−3 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33 no data
Valorant 35−40 no data

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 no data
Far Cry 5 6−7 no data
Forza Horizon 4 9−10 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6 no data

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 7−8 no data

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 no data
Valorant 18−20 no data

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 no data
Dota 2 10−12 no data
Far Cry 5 2−3 no data
Forza Horizon 4 4−5 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 4−5 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 August 2014 9 May 2007
Chip lithography 28 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 13 Watt

FirePro W4100 has an age advantage of 7 years, and a 60.7% more advanced lithography process.

GMA 3150, on the other hand, has 284.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FirePro W4100 and GMA 3150. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro W4100 is a workstation graphics card while GMA 3150 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro W4100
FirePro W4100
Intel GMA 3150
GMA 3150

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 82 votes

Rate FirePro W4100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 179 votes

Rate GMA 3150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro W4100 or GMA 3150, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.