Radeon RX 6600S vs FirePro W4000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated206
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data28.84
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code namePitcairnNavi 23
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date7 August 2012 (13 years ago)4 January 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7681792
Core clock speed825 MHz1700 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2000 MHz
Number of transistors2,800 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate39.60224.0
Floating-point processing power1.267 TFLOPS7.168 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs48112
Ray Tracing Coresno data28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length183 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth102.4 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPortNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 August 2012 4 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 80 Watt

FirePro W4000 has 6.7% lower power consumption.

RX 6600S, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FirePro W4000 and Radeon RX 6600S. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that FirePro W4000 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 6600S is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro W4000
FirePro W4000
AMD Radeon RX 6600S
Radeon RX 6600S

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate FirePro W4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 27 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6600S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro W4000 or Radeon RX 6600S, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.